Individual Forecaster Perceptions of the Persistence of Shocks to GDP
We analyze individual professional forecasters' beliefs concerning the persistence of GDP shocks. Despite substantial apparent heterogeneity in perceptions, with around one half of the sample of professional forecasters believing shocks do not have permanent effects, we show that these apparent differences may be largely due to short-samples and survey respondents being active at different times. When we control for these effects, using a bootstrap, we formally do not reject the null that individualslong-horizon expectations are interchangeable at a given point in time. When we apply the same bootstrap approach to their medium-term expectations, we do reject the null. We explore this difference between long and medium-horizon forecasts by decomposing revisions in forecasts into permanent and transitory components.
Keywords
Long-horizon forecasts, output persistence, heterogeneous beliefs, bootstrap test
JEL Classification
C53, C55, C83, E32.
Next Steps
Published on | 7 February 2020 |
---|---|
Authors | Professor Michael Clements |
Series Reference | ICM-2020-02 |
This site uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site you agree to these cookies being set. You can read more about what cookies we use here. If you do not wish to accept cookies from this site please either disable cookies or refrain from using the site.